From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Collins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2018
No. 2:15-cr-00176-7-TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2018)

Summary

granting motion where defendant argued early release would allow her to return to work to support her family and have more contact with her children without posing any risk to public in light of her rehabilitation

Summary of this case from United States v. Brown

Opinion

No. 2:15-cr-00176-7-TLN

03-05-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMBER COLLINS, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL RECOMMENDATION FOR TWELVE MONTHS COMMUNITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PLACEMENT

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Amber Collin's ("Defendant") Motion for Judicial Recommendation for Twelve Months of Community Correctional Facility Placement. (ECF No. 317.) Defendant's motion seeks a judicial recommendation to the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") for placement in a community correctional facility (halfway house or home detention) for 12 months preceding her release from confinement. (ECF No. 317 at 1.) The Government has filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 318.) The Court has carefully considered Defendant's arguments. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion for Judicial Recommendation, (ECF No. 317), is hereby GRANTED.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 27, 2017, Defendant pled guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, charging Conspiracy to Commit Access Device Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1029(b)(2). (ECF No. 159.) On March 1, 2018, the undersigned sentenced Defendant to a term of 30 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release. (ECF No. 316.) Following sentencing, Defendant submitted this motion for judicial recommendation for the maximum 12-month placement in a community correctional facility (halfway house or home detention). (ECF No. 317 at 1-2.)

II. LEGAL STANDARD

"Two statutory provisions govern the BOP's authority to place inmates in its custody in RRCs: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b) and 3624(c)." Sacora v. Thomas, 628 F.3d 1059, 1062 (9th Cir. 2010). Section 3621(b) "governs the BOP's authority in cases where a prisoner who has more than a year left to serve his or her prison sentence requests a transfer to a [RRC]." Id. Section 3624(c)(1), as amended by the Second Chance Act of 2007, provides that the BOP

shall, to the extent practicable, ensure that a prisoner serving a term of imprisonment spends a portion of the final months of that term (not to exceed 12 months), under conditions that will afford that prisoner a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for the reentry of that prisoner into the community. Such conditions may include a community correctional facility.
18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1). A sentencing court may make a recommendation that a prisoner serve a term of imprisonment in an RRC. 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b). A judicial recommendation is one factor that the BOP considers in determining a prisoner's placement, but a recommendation has "no binding effect" on the BOP to determine or change a prisoner's placement. 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

III. ANALYSIS

Defendant states early release into a halfway house will enable her "to return to work to support her family while still residing in a secure setting, and to have more contact with her children." (ECF No. 317 at 2.) Defendant argues "[s]he has demonstrated extraordinary rehabilitation, and does not pose a threat to public safety." (ECF No. 317 at 2.) Defendant argues the progress she has made toward rehabilitation demonstrate that she is "an excellent candidate for early release into a halfway house." (ECF No. 317 at 2.) The government filed a statement stating it does not oppose Defendant's request. (ECF No. 318 at 2.) /// ///

Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Judicial Recommendation, (ECF No. 317), is hereby GRANTED, and the Court recommends that BOP place Defendant in an appropriate pre-release placement for the maximum time for which she is eligible, not to exceed 12 months.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2018

/s/_________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Collins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2018
No. 2:15-cr-00176-7-TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2018)

granting motion where defendant argued early release would allow her to return to work to support her family and have more contact with her children without posing any risk to public in light of her rehabilitation

Summary of this case from United States v. Brown

granting such a request, without opposition by the government, under §§ 3621 & 3624

Summary of this case from Carter v. United States

granting such a request, without opposition by the government, under §§ 3621 & 3624

Summary of this case from United States v. Rehwinkel

granting such a request, without opposition by the government, under §§ 3621 & 3624

Summary of this case from United States v. Ross

granting such a request, without opposition by the government, under §§ 3621 & 3624

Summary of this case from United States v. Reavis

stating the Government did not oppose the recommendation

Summary of this case from United States v. Hoffman
Case details for

United States v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMBER COLLINS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2018

Citations

No. 2:15-cr-00176-7-TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2018)

Citing Cases

Walker v. United States

When determining whether to recommend that a specific individual be placed in an RRC, a court may consider…

United States v. Sharma

With respect to the issue of whether sentencing courts have the authority to make placement recommendations…