From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2012
473 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6514

05-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Paul Bernard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00207-JRS-7)

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Bernard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Bernard Coleman appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 3:09-cr-00207-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2012
473 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 31, 2012

Citations

473 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2012)