From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 3:09-cr-00240-4 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:09-cr-00240-4

01-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOWARD COLEMAN


Judge Nixon


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Howard Coleman's Motion for Leave to Join Previously Filed Motions ("Motion to Join"). (Doc. No. 1592.) Specifically, Mr. Coleman requests to join: Defendant Omega Harris's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Speedy Trial Act Rights and Memorandum in Support (Doc. Nos. 1104-05) and Motion to Reassert Pending Motions (Doc. No. 1234); Motions to Join and Adopt filed by Defendants Leonard Baugh, Paul McQuiddy, and Michael Devonn Davis (Doc. Nos. 1119; 1125; 1139); Defendant Anthony Johnson's Motion for Pretrial Notice of Government's Intent to Use 404(b) Evidence (Doc. No. 1126), Motion for Pretrial Notice of Government's Intent to Use 608 or 609 Impeachment Evidence (Doc. No. 1127), Motion for Disclosure of Intent to Use Evidence (Doc. No. 1128), Motion to Compel Disclosure of Promises (Doc. No. 1129), and Motion for Pretrial Disclosure of Witness List and Jencks Material (Doc. No. 1131); Defendant Tierra Young's Motion for Bill of Particulars (Doc. No. 1142) and Motion to Dismiss Due to Violation of Speedy Trial Rights (Doc. No. 1474); Defendant McQuiddy and Baugh's Motions to Reassert Pending Motions (Doc. No. 1234; 1237); and Defendant Faith Readus's Motion to Join Previously Filed Motions (Doc. No. 1588).

To the extent that Mr. Coleman requests to join motions to reassert pending motions and motions to join other motions, the Court finds that Mr. Coleman should be joined to the underlying substantive motions, rather than the motions to join or reassert. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Join (Doc. No. 1592) with respect to the motions under the following Docket Entries: 415; 417; 419; 421; 423; 425; 604; 656; 969; 970; 971; 972; 933; 1104; 1126; 1127; 1128; 1129; 1131; 1142; 1177; 1178; 1179; 1180; 1182; 1183; 1186; 1203; 1474; 1546; 1548; and 1554.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 3:09-cr-00240-4 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOWARD COLEMAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. 3:09-cr-00240-4 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)