From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 27, 2012
CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA

02-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAWLE COLE


ORDER

In a letter motion dated January 29, 2012, the defendant requests that this court delay its review of his case regarding the current crack amendment. He contends that he is still being held accountable for a large drug quantity for which he has been exonerated as a result of the ruling in Apprendi.

Presently, there is no motion pending before the court for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 and Amendment 750 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to stay (ECF No. 800) is moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 27, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 27, 2012
CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAWLE COLE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)