From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Colbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION
Oct 28, 2019
CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-CR-151-TBR-DW (W.D. Ky. Oct. 28, 2019)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-CR-151-TBR-DW

10-28-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. RONTEZ P. COLBERT, DEFENDANT

CC: Rontez P. Colbert 13313-033 MANCHESTER L-8 FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 4000 MANCHESTER, KY 40962 PRO SE


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Pro Se Defendant Rontez P. Colbert's Motion to Appoint Counsel. [DN 131]. The United States has not responded and the deadline to do so has passed. This matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons stated herein: Defendant's Motion to Appoint Counsel, [DN 131], is DENIED.

LEGAL STANDARD AND DISCUSSION

On September 28, 2011, a jury convicted Defendant of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. [DN 72]. He was designated as an armed career criminal and sentenced to 235 months in prison. [DN 87]. Defendant later appealed his conviction, but it was upheld by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [DN 100]. Between 2014 and 2016, Defendant filed two Motions to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a Motion to Alter Judgment, and a Motion for Reconsideration. [DN 102, 123, 126]. The Court denied each motion. [DN 119, 125, 128]. In August 2019, Defendant filed the Motion to Appoint Counsel currently before the Court. [DN 131].

In his Motion to Appoint Counsel, Defendant indicates that he plans to seek post-conviction relief in light of the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191, 204 L. Ed. 2d 594 (2019). Once a judgment of conviction is entered, the Court has limited jurisdiction to amend and modify the final judgment. "A federal prisoner who seeks to make a collateral post-conviction motion challenging the legality or validity of his judgment of conviction and sentence ordinarily is required to make a timely motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255." United States v. Wooden, No. 1:03-CR-66, 2008 WL 5110790, at *1 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2008) (citing United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 461 (6th Cir. 2001)). Once a defendant seeks post-conviction relief, a district court may appoint representation if the defendant is financially eligible and the interests of justice so require. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2). However, there is no "right under the United States Constitution or any other federal law to have the Court appoint counsel at government expense to assist [a defendant] in preparing a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that he hopes to file in the future." Wooden, 2008 WL 5110790, at *2; see also United States v. Pinkston, No. CR606-026, 2014 WL 12857426, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 18, 2014) (collecting cases) ("United States v. Harper, 2009 WL 2044820 at *1 (D. Neb. July 9, 2009) (motion for appointment of counsel is premature when filed prior to § 2255 motion); United States v. Wooden, 2008 WL 5110790 at *2 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2008) (same); see United States v. Green, 2006 WL 3627650 at *2 (D. Neb. Dec. 12, 2006) (declining to appoint counsel to assist defendant in preparing and filing a § 2255 motion); United States v. Mercado, 2002 WL 31619032 at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2002) (court sought defendant's consent to recharacterize filing as § 2255 motion and denied his accompanying motion to appoint counsel as premature); cf. Hansen v. United States, 956 F.2d 245, 248 (11th Cir. 1992) ("[w]e hold that a request by a prisoner for access to the court files of his underlying criminal convictions is premature prior to the filing of a collateral attack on that conviction"); United States v. Newsome, 257 F. Supp. 201, 203 (D. Ga. 1966) (same)").

In this case, Defendant's Motion to Appoint Counsel is premature because he has not filed a motion seeking post-conviction relief. Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice.

For the reasons stated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant's Motion to Appoint Counsel, [DN 131], is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge

United States District Court

October 28, 2019 CC: Rontez P. Colbert
13313-033
MANCHESTER
L-8
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION
Inmate Mail/Parcels
P.O. BOX 4000
MANCHESTER, KY 40962
PRO SE


Summaries of

United States v. Colbert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION
Oct 28, 2019
CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-CR-151-TBR-DW (W.D. Ky. Oct. 28, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Colbert

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. RONTEZ P. COLBERT, DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2019

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-CR-151-TBR-DW (W.D. Ky. Oct. 28, 2019)