Opinion
CR 23-95-GF-BMM
06-18-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS COCKLIN and ALLANA CORCORAN, Defendants.
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE
Brian Morris, Chief District Judge United State District Court
THIS matter comes before the Court on the United States' Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture. Defendants Nicholas Cocklin and Allana Corcoran entered into plea agreements that provide a factual basis and cause to issue a forfeiture order under 21 U.S.C. §§ 853(a)(1) and (2) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(11).
IT IS ORDERED:
THAT Defendant Cocklin's and Defendant Corcoran's interest in the following property is forfeited to the United States in accordance with 21 U.S.C. §§ 853(a)(1) and (2) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(11): $982.00 in U.S. Currency
THAT the DEA, United States Marshals Service, or a designated subcustodian is directed to seize the property subject to forfeiture and further to make a return as provided by law;
THAT the United States will provide written notice to all third parties asserting a legal interest in any of the above-described property and will post on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture. gov) for at least 30 consecutive days as required by Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, of the Court's preliminary order and the United States' intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), and to make its return to this Court that such action has been completed; and
THAT upon adjudication of all third-party interests, if any, the Court will enter a final order of forfeiture.