From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cnty. of Alameda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. C 11-3262 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 11-3262 EMC

10-04-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Defendants.

RICHARD KARLSSON, Interim County Counsel in and for the County of Alameda, State of California By: Raymond S. Lara Deputy County Counsel Attorneys Defendants THOMAS E. PEREZ Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division By: T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR TIMOTHY F. MELLETT BRUCE I. GEAR OLIMPIA E. MICHEL Attorneys for the Plaintiff, Voting Section Civil Rights Division United States Department of Justice


RICHARD KARLSSON [71421]

Interim County Counsel

By: RAYMOND S. LARA [213181]

Deputy County Counsel

Office of the County Counsel, County of Alameda

1221 Oak Street, Suite 450

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 272-6700

Attorneys for Defendants

The County of Alameda; Dave Macdonald,

Registrar of Voters for the County of Alameda; and

the Board of Supervisors for the County of Alameda

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE

PARTIES' COURT-ORDERED

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Civ. L. Rules 7-12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, this Court ordered further briefing on certain issues regarding the parties' consent decree;

WHEREAS, this Court's order gave the parties two weeks to file their supplemental briefing, which would be due on Wednesday, October 5, 2011;

WHEREAS, the parties are meeting and conferring on the supplemental briefing and expect to agree on all issues, but not before October 5, 2011, due to the unavailability of Defendant Dave Macdonald, Alameda County's Registrar of Voters, who will be out of the country until October 4, 2011; IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

The parties' supplemental briefing will be due on Wednesday, October 12, 2011, one week from the Court's original deadline.

If either party needs more time and the parties cannot agree to stipulate to a further extension, that party will file a motion for administrative relief under Civil Local Rule 7-11.

RICHARD KARLSSON, Interim County

Counsel in and for the County of Alameda,

State of California

By: Raymond S. Lara

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys Defendants

THOMAS E. PEREZ

Assistant Attorney General

Civil Rights Division

By: T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR

TIMOTHY F. MELLETT

BRUCE I. GEAR

OLIMPIA E. MICHEL

Attorneys for the Plaintiff,

Voting Section Civil Rights Division

United States Department of Justice

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Raymond S. Lara, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE PARTIES' COURT-ORDERED SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. I hereby attest that the above-referenced signatory to this stipulation has concurred in this filing.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDER

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

United States v. Cnty. of Alameda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. C 11-3262 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Cnty. of Alameda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 11-3262 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)