From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Close

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 9, 2019
931 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-30122

08-09-2019

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher CLOSE, Defendant, and Lost Creek Trust, Claimant-Appellant.

Arthur M. Bistline, Bistline Law PLLC, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for Claimant-Appellant. William Humphries and Kevin T. Maloney, Assistant United States Attorneys; Bart M. Davis, United States Attorney; Office of the United States Attorney, Boise, Idaho; for Plaintiff-Appellee.


Arthur M. Bistline, Bistline Law PLLC, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for Claimant-Appellant.

William Humphries and Kevin T. Maloney, Assistant United States Attorneys; Bart M. Davis, United States Attorney; Office of the United States Attorney, Boise, Idaho; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00069-EJL-1

Before: Richard A. Paez and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and C. Ashley Royal, District Judge.

The Honorable C. Ashley Royal, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
--------

ORDER

We are presented with the issue whether an appeal of a third-party proceeding ancillary to a criminal forfeiture action should be treated as a "civil" or "criminal" case for purposes of determining the deadline to file a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(a). In a similar context, we have held that for purposes of determining the timeliness of an appeal related to a third-party petition to amend a criminal forfeiture order, the third-party proceeding will be considered "civil in nature." United States v. Alcaraz-Garcia , 79 F.3d 769, 772 n.4 (9th Cir. 1996). We see no reason to depart from that approach in this context. We therefore hold that an appeal from a third-party proceeding ancillary to a criminal forfeiture action should be treated as a civil appeal for purposes of applying Rule 40(a).

Accordingly, Appellant Lost Creek Trust’s motion to reconsider (Dkt. No. 34) is GRANTED . The mandate is withdrawn. Appellant Lost Creek Trust’s petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc (Dkt. No. 30) are ordered filed. The clerk shall circulate the petition for rehearing en banc to the whole court.


Summaries of

United States v. Close

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 9, 2019
931 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Close

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER CLOSE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 9, 2019

Citations

931 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ritchie

When the Eastern District of Virginia, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 20, transferred this case to this Court,…