From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clermont

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
Feb 22, 2012
Docket No.: 11cr768(JLL) (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Docket No.: 11cr768(JLL)

02-22-2012

U.S. v. Jovany Clermont


ANTHONY C. MACK* +

KELVIN R. GIL*

* NJ AND NY BARS

+ Admitted to US Supreme Court

MACK & GIL, LLC

Attorneys-At-Law

A Limited Liability Company

NEW YORK OFFICE

REPLY TO NJ OFFICE

VIA ECF

Hon. Jose L. Linares, U.S.D.J.

U.S. District Court-N.J.

50 Walnut Street

Newark, NJ 07102
Dear Judge Linares:

Please be advised that this office represents the above referenced defendant. An Order was entered by your Honor which requires defense motions to be filed by February 24, 2012.

I do intend on filing motions one of which is a Title III Motion to Suppress Intercepted Wire Transmissions. I just received the affidavits request the authorization to intercept the calls on February 21, 2012.

Thus, I am requesting an additional week to March 2, 2012 to file my motions and thereby extending the Government's time to respond to March 16, 2012.

I have the consent of my adversary AUSA Michael Robertson. Thank you for your anticipated concern and cooperation.

Respectfully,

__________________

Anthony C. Mack, Esq.
cc: Michael Robertson, AUSA (via ECF)


Summaries of

United States v. Clermont

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
Feb 22, 2012
Docket No.: 11cr768(JLL) (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Clermont

Case Details

Full title:U.S. v. Jovany Clermont

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

Docket No.: 11cr768(JLL) (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2012)