From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clement

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 19, 2022
1:20-cr-00238-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cr-00238-JLT-SKO

10-19-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS CLEMENT 12, Defendant.


ORDER APPOINTING CJA LEAD COUNSEL AND WAIVING PRO HAC VICE FEE FOR COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO CALIFORNIA LEGAL PRACTICE - POTENTIAL DEATH PENALTY PROSECUTIONS

Francis Clement qualifies for court-appointed counsel. Good cause appearing, and considering Local Rule 180(b)(2), General Order 582 CJA Plan § XIV.C.1(g) and/or C.2, and the Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 7A concerning CJA appointed counsel, the Court ORDERS:

1. Jane Fisher-Byrialsen, Fisher & Byrialsen, PLLC, 4600 S. Syracuse Street, Denver, Colorado 80237, 303.256.6345, jane@fblaw.org, as CJA Lead Counsel to represent Francis Clement, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3005, 3006A and 3599, nunc pro tunc to his Initial Appearance date September 13, 2022.

2. This District's $225 pro hac vice admission fee for their CJA appointments in this case alone is waived, provided counsel qualifies otherwise for pro hac vice admission to the United States District Court, California Eastern District, under Local Rule 180 and the District's CJA Plan, General Order 582.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Clement

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 19, 2022
1:20-cr-00238-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Clement

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS CLEMENT 12, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 19, 2022

Citations

1:20-cr-00238-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2022)