From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Crim. No. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Crim. No. 12-2514

01-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERSHON CLARK

I hereby consent to the form and entry of this order. Fabiana Pierre-Louis Assistant U.S. Attorney Nelson S.T. Thayer, Jr. Attorney-in-Charge, Trenton Office Edward c. Bertucio, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Gershon Clark


Hon. Douglas E. Arpert


CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J, Fishman, united States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Fabiana Pierre-Louis, Assistant U.S. Attorney), and defendant Gershon Clark (by Edward c. Bertucio, Esq., attorney for defendant), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above - captioned matter for a period of 60 days; and three continuance having previously been granted by the Court pursuant to Title 18, United states Code, Section 3161 (h) (7) (A); and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within 30 days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and as the defendant has consented to such a continuance for a period of 60 days, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OP THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and the United States and defendant desire additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, which would thereby render trial of this matter unnecessary; and

2. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) , the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

WHEREFORE, it is on this 8th day of January 2013,

ORDERED that the proceedings scheduled in the above-captioned matter are continued for a period of 60 days from January 3, 2013 through and including March 3, 2013;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from January 3, 2013 through and including March 3, 2013 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974,

__________________

HONORABLE DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United states Magistrate Judge
I hereby consent to the form
and entry of this order.
_____________
Fabiana Pierre-Louis
Assistant U.S. Attorney
____________
Nelson S.T. Thayer, Jr.
Attorney-in-Charge, Trenton
Office
____________
Edward c. Bertucio, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant Gershon Clark


Summaries of

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Crim. No. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERSHON CLARK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Crim. No. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)