From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 25, 2012
Crim. NO. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Oct. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. NO. 12-2514

10-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERSHON CLARK

Fabiana Pierre-Louis Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward C, Bertucio, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Gershon Clark


Hon. Douglas E. Arpert


CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Fabiana Pierre-Louis, Assistant U.S. Attorney), and defendant Gershon Clark (by Edward C. Bertucio, Esq., attorney for defendant), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 60 days; and two continuance having previously been granted by the Court pursuant to Title 18, Unites States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A); and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within 30 days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and as the defendant has consented to such a continuance for a period of 60 days, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and the United States and defendant desire additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, which would thereby render trial of this matter unnecessary/ and

2. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7){A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

WHEREFORE, it is on this 23 day of October 2012,

ORDERED that the proceedings scheduled in the above-captioned matter are continued for a period of 60 days from October 23, 2012 through and including December 21, 2012;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from October 23, 2012 through and including December 21, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

______________________

HONORABLE DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United Stages Magistrate Judge
I hereby consent to the form
and entry of this Order.
______________________
Fabiana Pierre-Louis
Assistant U.S. Attorney
______________________
Edward C, Bertucio, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant Gershon Clark


Summaries of

United States v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 25, 2012
Crim. NO. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Oct. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERSHON CLARK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 25, 2012

Citations

Crim. NO. 12-2514 (D.N.J. Oct. 25, 2012)