From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 28, 2012
Case No. 77-71100 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 77-71100

06-28-2012

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. City of Detroit, et al., Defendants.


Honorable Sean F. Cox


ORDER STRIKING UNAUTHORIZED MOTION

FILED BY NON-PARTY AFTER DENIAL OF ITS MOTION TO INTERVENE

This action, which was commenced in 1977 and has been ongoing since that time, has an incredibly long history that is set forth in this Court's September 9, 2011 Opinion and Order (D.E. No. 2397).

On January 4, 2012, UAW Region 1, Local 2200 of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisors) ("Local 2200"), a labor union whose members include employees of the City of Detroit and the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, filed a motion seeking to intervene in this action. Along with that motion, Local 2200 filed a motion seeking to vacate this Court's November 4, 2011 Order. (Docket Entry No. 2430).

In an Opinion & Order issued on February 23, 2012, this Court denied Local 2200's Motion to Intervene. (Docket Entry No. 2445). This Court also denied Local 2200's Motion to Vacate as moot, given that ruling on its Motion to Intervene. (See 2/23/12 Opinion & Order at 37 n.10, explaining that the denial of an application to intervene renders any substantive motion accompanying the application to intervene moot and citing In re PaineWebber Inc., Ltd. P'ships Litig., 94 F.3d 49, 52 (2d Cir. 1996)).

Local 2200 appealed this Court's February 23, 2012 ruling denying its Motion to Intervene. (See Notice of Appeal, Docket Entry No. 2452). The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has not yet issued any ruling as to that appeal.

Although this Court previously denied its Motion to Intervene, and the Sixth Circuit has yet to rule on the appeal of that ruling, Local 2200 filed an unauthorized substantive motion in this action on June 5, 2012. (Docket Entry No. 2463, Local 2200's "Motion for the Court to Clarify the Parameters of its November 4, 2011 Order and Opinion"). The Court hereby ORDERS that Docket Entry No. 2463 is STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on June 28, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Jennifer Hernandez

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 28, 2012
Case No. 77-71100 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 28, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. City of Detroit, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

Case No. 77-71100 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 28, 2012)