From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Citgo Asphalt Ref. Co. (In re Frescati Shipping Co.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jun 28, 2013
No. 11-2576 (3d Cir. Jun. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-2576 No. 11-2577

06-28-2013

In re: PETITION OF FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., AS OWNER OF THE M/T ATHOS I AND TSAKOS SHIPPING & TRADING, S.A., AS MANAGER OF THE ATHOS I FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY; CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; CITGO EAST COAST OIL CORPORATION


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-05-cv-00305 / 2-08-cv-02898)

Trial District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam

District Judge: Honorable Joel H. Slomsky

Judge Slomsky was assigned to this matter following the retirement of Judge Fullam, who presided at trial and ruled on the merits.

Before: AMBRO, GREENAWAY, Jr., and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge

Honorable Kathleen M. O'Malley, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
--------


ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed May 16, 2013, be amended as follows:

On page 37, in the first full paragraph, last sentence, replace the name "Frescati" with the name "CARCO," so that the phrase reads: "Because it appears that CARCO assured a safe berth ..."

By the Court,

Thomas L. Ambro , Circuit Judge PDB/TMM/cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

United States v. Citgo Asphalt Ref. Co. (In re Frescati Shipping Co.)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jun 28, 2013
No. 11-2576 (3d Cir. Jun. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Citgo Asphalt Ref. Co. (In re Frescati Shipping Co.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: PETITION OF FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., AS OWNER OF THE M/T…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

No. 11-2576 (3d Cir. Jun. 28, 2013)