From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
CASE NO. 12CR5155-JLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR5155-JLS

02-01-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MISHELL CID (1), Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: X an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or _ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or _ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or _ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or _ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or _ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) as charged in the Information:

21:952 AND 960 - IMPORTATION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

_______________

Janis L. Sammartino

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
CASE NO. 12CR5155-JLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Cid

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MISHELL CID (1), Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR5155-JLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)