From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Christensen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 5, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CR-00070 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CR-00070 JAM

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COLLINS CHRISTENSEN, Defendant.

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT (STATE BAR NO. 142413) COURTNEY J. LINN (STATE BAR NO. 148855) CAMERON L. DESMOND (STATE BAR NO. 268925) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Attorneys for Defendant COLLINS CHRISTENSEN


MCGREGOR W. SCOTT (STATE BAR NO. 142413)

COURTNEY J. LINN (STATE BAR NO. 148855)

CAMERON L. DESMOND (STATE BAR NO. 268925)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

COLLINS CHRISTENSEN

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING RESTITUTION

HEARING


Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court so order, that the restitution hearing, presently set for January 10, 2012, be continued until January 17, 2012.

In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows:

1. Mr. Christensen was sentenced on October 18, 2011;

2. During the sentencing, the Court continued the restitution hearing until January 10, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5);

3. The requested date, January 17, 2012, comes within the 90-day time limit for conducting the restitution hearing, 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45;

4. A one-week continuance is necessary to procure Mr. Christensen's signed waiver of his right to appear at the hearing;

5. A continuance is also necessary to allow both parties time to review relevant evidence and to determine whether a stipulation of restitution is possible, thereby relieving the Court of the burden of conducting a hearing.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the parties hereby stipulate that the restitution hearing be continued from January 10, 2012, to January 17, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT

COURTNEY J. LINN

CAMERON L. DESMOND

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

By: _________________________

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT

Attorneys for Defendant

COLLINS CHRISTENSEN

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

By: _________________________

Russell L. Carlberg

Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

Hon. John A. Mendez

Judge of the District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Christensen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 5, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CR-00070 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COLLINS CHRISTENSEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CR-00070 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)