From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 10-CR00042 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 10-CR00042 MCE

10-31-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CHONG, KEIT TRAN, ROBERT LY, aka "BUTT," JAMES LEROY JOHNSON, DARRYL RICHARD SMITH, VY PHAM, and DASSANY KEOPHIMANH, Defendant.

LIPTON & PIPER, LLP ARTHUR C. LIPTON, C.S.B.#74710 JONATHAN L. PIPER, C.S.B. #225701 Attorneys for Defendant, DAVID CHONG


LIPTON & PIPER, LLP

ARTHUR C. LIPTON, C.S.B.#74710

JONATHAN L. PIPER, C.S.B. #225701

Attorneys for Defendant,

DAVID CHONG

EX PARTE REQUEST AND ORDER TO

MODIFY CONDITIONS OF PRETRIAL

RELEASE

COMES NOW defendant, DAVID CHONG, through counsel, and hereby requests that the terms of his pretrial release be modified to exclude the curfew and electronic monitoring. All other terms are to remain in place. In support of said request, counsel declares:

I am an attorney licensed to practice in the state of California and before this Court. I am one of the attorneys of record for defendant DAVID CHONG.

Currently as part of his pretrial release, Mr. Chong has a curfew and is required to comply with electronic monitoring. Since his release, Mr. Chong has complied with the curfew and electronic monitoring requirements and has only had a few instances where he has reported late.

I have discussed this matter with United States Pretrial Services Officer David Horcon and with Assistant United States Attorney Jason Hitt. Pretrial Services has no objections to this request, but Mr. Hitt informed me that he is objecting.

Under the circumstances, I respectfully request that the court grant Mr. Chong's request. I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration is executed on October 11, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

Jonathan L. Piper,

Attorney for DAVID CHONG

ORDER

The request of defendant, DAVID CHONG, to modify the terms of his pretrial release so that Mr. Chong will no longer be required to have a curfew or comply with electronic monitoring is DENIED. All previously imposed terms of pretrial release remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Chong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No: 10-CR00042 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Chong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CHONG, KEIT TRAN, ROBERT LY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No: 10-CR00042 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)