Opinion
20-7386
07-06-2021
Ronald Chisholm, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: June 10, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:14-cr-00132-LRL-1)
Ronald Chisholm, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Ronald Chisholm appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Chisholm's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chisholm, No. 2:14-cr-00132-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2020). We deny Chisholm's motion to amend or correct his compassionate release motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED