Opinion
21 Cr. 463 (CS)
12-15-2022
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT
HONORABLE CATHY SEIBEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, on or about July 20, 2021, PEDRO CHINNERY (the “Defendant”), among others, was charged in one count of two-count Indictment, 21 Cr. 463 (CS) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 (Count One);
WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of said offense and any and all property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, on or about August 12, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment and agreed to forfeit a sum of money equal $525,000 in United States currency representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Government asserts that $525,000 in United States currency represents the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, that the Defendant personally obtained;
WHEREAS, the Government seeks a money judgment in the amount of $525,000 in United States currency, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, and
WHEREAS, the Court finds that as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $525,000 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, Pedro Chinnery, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.
6, Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same
SO ORDERED: