From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chestnut

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 22, 2013
No. 13-6197 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6197

07-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, Defendant - Appellant.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Chestnut's motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Chestnut

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 22, 2013
No. 13-6197 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Chestnut

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAYMOND EDWARD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 22, 2013

Citations

No. 13-6197 (4th Cir. Jul. 22, 2013)