From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cheal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2015
2:12-cr-185 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendant ROBB CHEAL

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Assistant Federal Defender, Attorneys for Robb Cheal

          CHRIS COSCA, Attorney for Ryan Cheal.

          OLAF HEDBERG, Attorney for Robert Carrillo

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO OCTOBER 29, 2015, AT 9:30 A.M.

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         The parties stipulate, through respective counsel, that the Court should continue the status conference set for September 24, 2015, at 9:30 a.m., to October 29, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

         Defense counsel requires the continuance to consult with their clients about discovery, and to conduct investigation. Defense counsel also requires further time to meet and consult with each other. Finally, Defense counsel requires further time to meet and confer with their clients regarding plea agreements that the government has proposed, and to propose counter offers to the government.

         Counsel and the defendants agree that the Court should exclude the time from today through October 29, 2015, when it computes the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), and Local Code T4. Counsel and the defendants also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

          ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders the status conference rescheduled for October 29, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. The Court orders the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including October 29, 2015, excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), and Local Code T4.


Summaries of

United States v. Cheal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2015
2:12-cr-185 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Cheal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBB CHEAL, RYAN CHEAL, ROBERT…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

Citations

2:12-cr-185 TLN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2015)