Summary
finding photos improperly authenticated when the government's witness testified only that "he had found the photos on [the defendant's] website" and the defendant conceded the website was his
Summary of this case from United States v. OkulajaOpinion
No. 12-41182
06-20-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE CHAVEZ-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Summary Calendar
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-1014-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Chavez-Valencia (Chavez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chavez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chavez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.