From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chatman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 3:10-cr-30-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cr-30-KRG-KAP Case No. 3:13-cv-286-KRG-KAP

02-10-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DELFON L. CHATMAN, Movant


Memorandum Order

Delfon Chatman's motion to vacate, docket no. 301, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(3), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on January 22, 2015, docket no. 310, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed timely objections and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter, together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2015, it is

ORDERED that the motion to vacate, docket no. 301, is denied. No certificate of appealability is issued. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark the civil matter closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by ECF to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Delfon Chatman, Reg. No. 32600-068
F.C.I. Gilmer
P.O. Box 6000
Glenville, WV 26351


Summaries of

United States v. Chatman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 3:10-cr-30-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Chatman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DELFON L. CHATMAN, Movant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cr-30-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Harris

The government's current policy is not to seek appellate and collateral waivers but to enforce those…