From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chartraw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cr-00184-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cr-00184-MCE

07-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL CHARTRAW, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant DANIEL CHARTRAW BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL CHARTRAW

STIPULATION AND ORDER


DATE: September 6, 2012

JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through MICHAEL ANDERSON, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant DANIEL CHARTRAW by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Thursday, July 19, 2012, be continued to Thursday, September 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for , 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

______________________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL CHARTRAW

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________________

MICHAEL ANDERSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set July 19, 2012 status conference shall be continued to September 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, July 12, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference, September 6, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

The Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Chartraw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cr-00184-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Chartraw

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL CHARTRAW, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cr-00184-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)