From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Charles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
NO. 1:11-cr-00392 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-cr-00392 AWI

01-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL DESHAWN CHARLES, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ELANA S. LANDAU Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL DESHAWN CHARLES


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL DESHAWN CHARLES

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, ELANA S. LANDAU, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Michael Deshawn Charles, that the date for status conference may be continued to February 27, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is January 17, 2012. The requested new date is February 27, 2012.

This continuance is requested to allow additional time for investigation regarding a proper resolution of this case.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By Elana S. Landau

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By Eric V. Kersten

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL DESHAWN CHARLES

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

____________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Charles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
NO. 1:11-cr-00392 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL DESHAWN CHARLES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

NO. 1:11-cr-00392 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)