From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chapon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 10, 2023
2:20-cr-00286-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00286-JCM-NJK

07-10-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KAREN CHAPON, Defendant.

RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender BRIAN PUGH Assistant Federal Public Defender Attorney for Karen Chapon JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JESSICA OLIVA Assistant United States Attorney


RENE L. VALLADARES

Federal Public Defender

BRIAN PUGH

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Karen Chapon

JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

JESSICA OLIVA

Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION TO EXTEND MOTION DEADLINES (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Jessica Oliva, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Brian Pugh, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Karen Chapon:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties herein shall have to and including July 21, 2023, to file any and all pretrial motions and notices of defense.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including August 4, 2023, to file any and all responsive pleadings.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including August 11, 2023, to file any and all replies to dispositive motions.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties are attempting to negotiate a resolution of the case without the need for trial or pretrial motions. The parties need a short continuance of the motion deadlines to continue negotiations; however, the defendant needs to maintain her right to file pretrial motions in the event the negotiations are unsuccessful.

2. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively complete investigation of the discovery materials provided and to adequately consult with defendant in order to determine whether the case will ultimately go to trial or be resolved through a guilty plea.

This is the first stipulation to continue filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The parties are attempting to negotiate a resolution of the case without the need for trial or pretrial motions. The parties need a short continuance of the motion deadlines to continue negotiations; however, the defendant needs to maintain her right to file pretrial motions in the event the negotiations are unsuccessful.

2. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively complete investigation of the discovery materials provided and to adequately consult with defendant in order to determine whether the case will ultimately go to trial or be resolved through a guilty plea.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and Section § 3161 (h)(7)(A), when considering factors under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i),(iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties herein shall have to and including July 21, 2023, to file any and all pretrial motions and notices of defense.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties herein shall have to and including August 4, 2023, to file any and all responsive pleadings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties herein shall have to and including August 11, 2023, to file any and all replies to dispositive motions.


Summaries of

United States v. Chapon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 10, 2023
2:20-cr-00286-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Chapon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KAREN CHAPON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 10, 2023

Citations

2:20-cr-00286-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)