From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chapman

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Oct 18, 2021
Crim. Action 1:20-CR-86-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Crim. Action 1:20-CR-86-2

10-18-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANGELA NICHOLE CHAPMAN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE [DKT. NO. 117], ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

THOMAS S. KLEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 24, 2021, the Defendant, Angela Nichole Chapman, (“Chapman”), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Three of the Indictment, charging her with Possession with Intent to Distribute Fifty Grams or More of Methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)(viii). Chapman stated that she understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and Chapman consented to pleading before the magistrate judge. This Court referred Chapman's plea of guilty to the magistrate judge for the purpose of administering the allocution, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Chapman's statements during the plea hearing, and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Chapman was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that Chapman was aware of the nature of the charges against her and the consequences of her plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case (“R&R”) [Dkt. No. 117] finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Chapman's plea of guilty to Count Three of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge released Defendant on the terms of the Order Setting Conditions of Release. [Dkt. No. 38].

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither Chapman nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [Dkt. No. 117], provisionally ACCEPTS Chapman's guilty plea, and ADJUDGES her GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Three of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence investigation report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Chapman, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;

2. The Government and Chapman shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by October 28, 2021;

3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Chapman, her counsel, and the Government on or before December 30, 2021; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before January 13, 2022;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before January 27, 2022; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing memorandum or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before February 10, 2022.

The Court further ORDERS that prior to sentencing, counsel for Defendant review with her the revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions adopted by this Court on November 29, 2016, pursuant to the standing order entered by Chief Judge Groh, In Re: Revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions, 3:16-MC-56.

The Court will conduct the Sentencing Hearing for Chapman on March 1 2022, at 1:00 p.m., at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court. If counsel anticipates having multiple witnesses or an otherwise lengthy sentencing hearing, please notify the Judge's chamber staff so that an adequate amount of time can be scheduled.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies.


Summaries of

United States v. Chapman

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Oct 18, 2021
Crim. Action 1:20-CR-86-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANGELA NICHOLE CHAPMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

Crim. Action 1:20-CR-86-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 18, 2021)