From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chandavong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. 2:11-cr-379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-379 MCE

10-25-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG, Defendant.

Matthew Morris Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Staniels Assistant Federal Defender Counsel for Defendant PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant that the above case, be dropped from this court's October 20, 2011. calendar, at the request of the defense, and be continued until December 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time be excluded between October 20, 2011, through and including December 1, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv). Local Code T-4.

This first continuance is requested in order to consult and review with Mr. Chandavong discovery and options open to him in responding to the charges.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Matthew Morris

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG

ORDER

WHEREAS this is the first continuance requested in this matter, and,

WHEREAS counsel anticipate making progress in resolving this matter efficiently and without protracted litigation,

THEREFORE, the stipulation is accepted, and the requested continuance of this matter from October 20, 2011, until December 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. is granted. Time is excluded pursuant to the parties' stipulation between October 20, 2011, through and including December 1, 2011. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv); Local Code T-4. The court specifically finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the public and of the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Chandavong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. 2:11-cr-379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Chandavong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)