From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chandavong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-00379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-00379 MCE

01-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE


Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant that the above case, be dropped from this court's January 12, 2012 calendar, at the request of the defense, and be continued until February 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time be excluded between January 12, 2012, through and including February 9, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv). Local Code T-4.

Counsel for the parties have agreed in principle to the outlines of a non-trial disposition, and to most of the terms. This continuance is requested in order to permit resolution of remaining terms and consultation and review of that proposed disposition with Mr. Chandavong. The proposed date allows for the respective consults and approvals needed by both counsel and by their respective pre-existing schedules.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

___________

Matthew Morris

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

___________

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG

ORDER

The above stipulation of counsel is accepted, and the requested continuance is granted. For the reasons stated therein, the court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the public and of the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND. JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Stipulation & Order
Continuing Case and Excluding Time


Summaries of

United States v. Chandavong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-00379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Chandavong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHAYLOTH CHANDAVONG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-00379 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)