From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Chan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00113 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00113 AWI

01-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDY YUNG KWONG CHAN, ET AL., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LAUREL J. MONTOYA Assistant U.S. Attorney ALONZO J. GRADFORD Attorney for Defendant Andy Yung Kwong Chan SETH P. CHAZIN Attorney for Defendant John Zhong Xian Huang GEORGE SIDDELL Attorney for Defendant Chiu Chuen Lau DORON WEINBERG Attorney for Defendant Tony Chao Fan Luo KIRK MCALLISTER Attorney for Defendant HARRIS B. TABACK Attorney for Defendant Yao Ming Yu


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER


PLACE: Courtroom Two

Honorable

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the current status conference set for January 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to March 26, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable , United States District Court Judge.

The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between January 23, 2012, and March 26, 2012 be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, plea offers have been provided and plea negotiations continue to be ongoing. Additionally, counsel for defendant Huang is getting ready to start a four week trial and the preparation has been particularly time consuming. The parties are requesting an afternoon setting because defense counsel are traveling from San Diego, Modesto, and the Bay Area. The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

__________________

ALONZO J. GRADFORD

Attorney for Defendant

Andy Yung Kwong Chan

____________

SETH P. CHAZIN

Attorney for Defendant

John Zhong Xian Huang

____________

GEORGE SIDDELL

Attorney for Defendant

Chiu Chuen Lau

____________

DORON WEINBERG

Attorney for Defendant

Tony Chao Fan Luo

____________

KIRK MCALLISTER

Attorney for Defendant

Michael Chau

____________

HARRIS B. TABACK

Attorney for Defendant

Yao Ming Yu

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Status Conference hearing of January 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to March 26, 2012, at 1:30 P.M. Time shall be excluded to and through that date. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause and the Court finds the ends of justice outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Chan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00113 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Chan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDY YUNG KWONG CHAN, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00113 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)