From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cepero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
2:10-CR-00178-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

2:10-CR-00178-PMP-VCF

03-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BILLY CEPERO, Defendant.


ORDER

In accord with the attached Order of the Appellate Commissioner for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Cepero shall have to and including April 19, 2013 within which to show cause in writing why he failed to timely file his Notice of Appeal in this case and to request that the time for filing his Notice of Appeal be extended for a period of thirty (30) days within which to do so.

____________________________

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. BILLY CEPERO,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10124


D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00178-PMP-

VCF-1

District of Nevada,

Las Vegas


ORDER

Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner.

On January 28, 2013, appellant filed, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1), a notice of appeal from the district court's order entered on January 7, 2013. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 14 days after entry of the order, it was not timely under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). The notice of appeal, however, was filed within 30 days after the expiration of the time to file the notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). Accordingly, pursuant to circuit court policy, this case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to provide appellant notice and an opportunity to request that the time for filing the notice of appeal be extended, for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time prescribed by Rule 4(b), upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Ono, 72 F.3d 101, 103 (9th Cir. 1995) (order); United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108, 112 (9th Cir. 1976).

The district court is requested to make this determination at its earliest convenience and to send to this court a copy of its order setting forth the basis for its determination.

The proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district court's determination.

The Clerk shall serve this order on the district judge.


Summaries of

United States v. Cepero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
2:10-CR-00178-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Cepero

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BILLY CEPERO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

2:10-CR-00178-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)