From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cearlock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
CR. 2:11-CR-00182 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CR. 2:11-CR-00182 GEB

01-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE LEE CEARLOCK, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KYLE REARDON Assistant U.S. Attorney By: KYLE REARDON Assistant U.S. Attorney By: CLYDE BLACKMON Attorney for the Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL


Court: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

The parties request that the trial confirmation hearing set for Friday, January 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and the trial set for February 15, 2012, be vacated, and request that this matter be set for a status conference on Friday, February 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The Court previously excluded time under Local Code T4 until the start of trial. The parties stipulate that this previously granted exclusion of time under Local Code T4 should be continued, and that the time between the granting of the parties' requested order and February 3, 2012, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

Both parties need additional time to investigate and adequately prepare. Specifically, the defense has brought to the attention of the government communications that the defendant had with government officials that may have an impact on the case. In addition, Defense Counsel needs additional time to review the defendant's entire case file in order to properly advise his client. Finally, both parties are investigating the issue of loss in this case, and the results of that investigation may impact ongoing plea negotiations.

Accordingly, the parties believe that time should continued to be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. The additional time is necessary to ensure effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4. The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: CLYDE BLACKMON

Attorney for the Defendant

ORDER

The trial confirmation hearing currently set for January 27, 2012, and the trial date currently set for February 15, 2012, in case number 2:11-CR-00182 GEB, are vacated. The matter is set for a further status conference on Friday, February 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and the time between the filing of this order and February 3, 2012, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161 and Local Code T4. The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

GARLAND E. BURELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cearlock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
CR. 2:11-CR-00182 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cearlock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE LEE CEARLOCK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

CR. 2:11-CR-00182 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)