From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Castillo

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 12, 2023
No. CR21-0174-JCC-4 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

CR21-0174-JCC-4

10-12-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMADO PEDRO CASTILLO, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's motion to continue trial. (Dkt. No. 664.) Trial in this matter is currently set for October, 23, 2023. (Dkt. No. 636.) Defendant seeks a continuance due to a medical emergency. (Id.) Mr. Castillo is presently in New York and, as stated by his counsel, is experiencing debilitating symptoms. (Id.) The Court understands Defendant's argument to be that a continuance would serve the interest of justice in ensuring an orderly administration of trial. The Government has made the Court aware of its own scheduling conflicts. Based on the foregoing, the Court FINDS that the ends of justice will best be served by a continuance, and the ends of justice outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in any speedier trial, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The basis for this is as follows:

1. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv);
2. Failure to grant a continuance would likely result in the miscarriage of justice, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(i);
3. The additional time requested is a reasonable period of delay in view of Defendant's circumstance; and
4. The additional time requested between the current trial date and the new trial date is necessary to provide the time required to adequately tend to trial-related matters considering Defendant's medical ailment and the Government's competing schedule.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 664) is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that the trial date be CONTINUED to January 29, 2024 and that the time between the filing of this motion to continue and the new trial date is excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act, as provided in 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).


Summaries of

United States v. Castillo

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 12, 2023
No. CR21-0174-JCC-4 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMADO PEDRO CASTILLO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

No. CR21-0174-JCC-4 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)