From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Castillo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2020
No. 20-10233 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-10233

08-26-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAMON FRANCISCO CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00175-RBD-LRH Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, counsel for Ramon Francisco Castillo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Castillo's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Castillo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2020
No. 20-10233 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAMON FRANCISCO CASTILLO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

No. 20-10233 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)