From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Casarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO.: l:ll-cr-00274-LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: l:ll-cr-00274-LJO

10-04-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALFONSO CASAREZ, ROSEMARY FIERROS, VICTOR VASQUEZ, ANGEL OCIRIS GUTIERREZ, ALCIDES URIAS, DIMAS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ, JESUS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ, LUIS ALBERTO MORENO DELGADO, ARMANDO TREYES ANDRADE, ARMANDO SOLORIO HEREDIA, JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, ARMANDO MARAVILLA, and CASSANDRA CASAREZ FIERROS, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III Assistant U.S. Attorney MARC DAYS Attorney for Defendant ALFONSO CASAREZ JAMES R. HOMOLA Attorney for Defendant ROSEMARY FIERROS MARTIN TALEISNIK Attorney for Defendant VICTOR VASQUEZ DANIEL A. BACON Attorney for Defendant ANGEL OCIRIS GUTIERREZ DAVID J. COHEN Attorney for Defendant ALCIDES URIAS JULIUS M. CRUZ Attorney for Defendant DIMAS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ DALE A. BLICKENSTAFF Attorney for Defendant JESUS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ TINA M. BARBERI Attorney for Defendant JOSE MANUEL GARCIA GARY L. HUSS Attorney for Defendant LUIS ALBERTO MORENO DELGADO PETER M. JONES Attorney for Defendant ARMANDO TREYES ANDRADE DAVID E. JONES Attorney for Defendant ARMANDO SOLORIO HEREDIA BARBARA H. O'NEILL Attorney for Defendant ARMANDO MARAVILLA ERIC K. FOGDERUDE Attorney for Defendant CASSANDRA CASAREZ FIERROS


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

GRANT B. RABENN

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

ORDER BETWEEN THE UNITED

STATES AND DEFENDANTS

WHEREAS, the discovery in this case is voluminous and contains a large amount of personal and confidential information including but not limited to Social Security numbers, dates of birth, bank account numbers, telephone numbers, and residential addresses ("Protected Information"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid both the necessity of large scale redactions and the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of this information to anyone not a party to the court proceedings in this matter;

The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate.

THEREFORE, Defendants, by and through their counsel of record ("Defense Counsel"), and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Henry Z. Carbajal III, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This Court may enter a protective order pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

2. This Order pertains to all discovery provided to or made available to Defense Counsel as part of discovery in this case (hereafter, collectively known as "the discovery").

3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to share any documents that contain Protected Information with anyone other than Defense Counsel attorneys, designated defense investigators, and support staff. Defense Counsel may permit the Defendant to view unredacted documents in the presence of his attorney, defense investigators, and support staff. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not allow the Defendant to copy Protected Information contained in the discovery. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff may provide the Defendant with copies of documents from which Protected Information has been redacted.

4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose. The discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States of America ("Government"). Defense Counsel will return the discovery to the Government or certify that it has been shredded at the conclusion of the case.

5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising his Defendant, employees, and other members of the defense team, and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

7. In the event that Defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant U.S. Attorney

MARC DAYS

Attorney for Defendant

ALFONSO CASAREZ

JAMES R. HOMOLA

Attorney for Defendant

ROSEMARY FIERROS

MARTIN TALEISNIK

Attorney for Defendant

VICTOR VASQUEZ

DANIEL A. BACON

Attorney for Defendant

ANGEL OCIRIS GUTIERREZ

DAVID J. COHEN

Attorney for Defendant

ALCIDES URIAS

JULIUS M. CRUZ

Attorney for Defendant

DIMAS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ

DALE A. BLICKENSTAFF

Attorney for Defendant

JESUS DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ

TINA M. BARBERI

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE MANUEL GARCIA

GARY L. HUSS

Attorney for Defendant

LUIS ALBERTO MORENO DELGADO

PETER M. JONES

Attorney for Defendant

ARMANDO TREYES ANDRADE

DAVID E. JONES

Attorney for Defendant

ARMANDO SOLORIO HEREDIA

BARBARA H. O'NEILL

Attorney for Defendant

ARMANDO MARAVILLA

ERIC K. FOGDERUDE

Attorney for Defendant

CASSANDRA CASAREZ FIERROS

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Casarez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO.: l:ll-cr-00274-LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Casarez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALFONSO CASAREZ, ROSEMARY FIERROS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: l:ll-cr-00274-LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)