From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carver

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 2005
143 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Matthew E. Sloan, USLA--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark McBride, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Howard B. Carver, III appeals his 87-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Carver

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 2005
143 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Carver

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Howard B. CARVER, III…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 16, 2005

Citations

143 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2005)