From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cartwright

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Feb 28, 2023
3:22-cr-00172 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cr-00172

02-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TUPAC CARTWRIGHT


ORDER

BARBARA D. HOLMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act of 2020, the Court reminds the government of its obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The government is ordered to produce such evidence reasonably promptly upon discovery. Failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court, or any other remedy that is just under the circumstances.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Cartwright

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Feb 28, 2023
3:22-cr-00172 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Cartwright

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TUPAC CARTWRIGHT

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

3:22-cr-00172 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2023)