From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2019
No. 19-1342 (4th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1342

08-22-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LEWIS F. CARTER, Defendant - Appellant, and MARY CARTER; BOBBY CARTER; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Defendants.

Lewis F. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Randolph Lyons Hutter, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00674-MHL) Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lewis F. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Randolph Lyons Hutter, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lewis F. Carter appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the United States in its action seeking to foreclose federal tax liens. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carter, No. 3:16-cv-00674-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2018). We deny Carter's motions for a stay pending appeal and for a hearing, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2019
No. 19-1342 (4th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LEWIS F. CARTER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1342 (4th Cir. Aug. 22, 2019)