From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carroll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 2, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 09-3458-WJ (D.N.M. Jun. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 09-3458-WJ

06-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REEHAHLIO CARROLL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN

LIMINE REGARDING FLIGHT EVIDENCE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Government's Motion in Limine Advising the Court of the Use of Flight Evidence on November 4, 2009, filed May 21, 2012 (Doc. 148). Having considered the parties' briefs and the applicable law, I find that the Government's motion is well-taken and will be granted.

Defendant escaped from the custody of the Navajo police after being apprehended on November 2, 2012. On November 4, after he was again pursued by police, he managed to escape again without being apprehended. Defendant was eventually apprehended by Navajo police on November 5, 2009. The United States intends to use this evidence, particularly evidence of the car chase on November 4, 2009, to establish consciousness of guilt and as being inextricably intertwined with the events of the Defendant's escape and apprehension.

Defendant's response was due Friday, May 25, 2012 (see Doc. 121 at 2), but no response has been filed.

The Court agrees with the Government that the evidence regarding Defendant's flight is admissible to establish consciousness of guilt. United States v. Chancellor, 2010 WL 1645142,at *3 -*4 (10th Cir. 2010) (unpublished opinion); United States v. Akers, 215 F.3d 1089, 1103 (10th Cir. 2000) (defendant's flight from halfway house while awaiting trial properly admitted as evidence of guilt as to charged offenses); United States v. Lepanto, 817 F.2d 1463, 1467 (10th Cir. 1987) (holding that guilt of the charged offense need not be the only possible inference to be drawn from evidence of flight, it need only be a permissible inference); United States v. Martinez, 681 F.2d 1248, 1256 (10th Cir. 1982) ("flight evidence is permissible proof of the defendant's "consciousness of guilt" and carries "a strong presumption of admissibility").

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.

_________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Carroll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 2, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 09-3458-WJ (D.N.M. Jun. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REEHAHLIO CARROLL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jun 2, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 09-3458-WJ (D.N.M. Jun. 2, 2012)