From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Caramadre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Jul 27, 2012
CR. No. 11-186 S (D.R.I. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CR. No. 11-186 S

07-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH CARAMADRE; and RAYMOUR RADHAKRISHNAN, Defendants


ORDER

Before the Court is the government's motion to disqualify Anthony Traini, Esq. from serving as Defendant Joseph Caramadre's attorney in the above-captioned matter based on a conflict of interest due to Mr. Traini's representation of Edward Maggiacomo, Jr. Having considered the arguments of the parties, in camera review of documents submitted by defense counsel, and the sworn answers to the Court's questions of both Defendant Caramadre and Mr. Maggiacomo, the Court is satisfied that any waiver of conflict is knowing and voluntary by both Defendant Caramadre and Mr. Maggiacomo, the Court hereby DENIES the government's motion to disqualify. The Court will issue a memorandum in the near future to further explicate the reasoning underlying this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

William E. Smith

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Caramadre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Jul 27, 2012
CR. No. 11-186 S (D.R.I. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Caramadre

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH CARAMADRE; and RAYMOUR RADHAKRISHNAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

CR. No. 11-186 S (D.R.I. Jul. 27, 2012)