From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2019
CASE NO. 9:14-CR-00010-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 9:14-CR-00010-RC

04-04-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES CANNON


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence.

At the close of the revocation hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn recommended: 1. that the court find that the Defendant violated the first allegation in the petition that he failed to follow a special condition of release; 2. that the Defendant's supervised release should be revoked pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and 3. the Defendant should be sentenced to a term of 5 months' imprisonment, with no supervised release to follow. His term of imprisonment should be served at the Federal Correctional Institute near Houston, Texas, if the Bureau of Prisons can accommodate such request.

At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel and counsel for the Government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge's report, consenting to revocation of supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. The Defendant also waived his right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the court imposes the recommended sentence.

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and Charles Cannon's supervised release is REVOKED.

Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendations.

So Ordered and Signed

Apr 4, 2019

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2019
CASE NO. 9:14-CR-00010-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES CANNON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 9:14-CR-00010-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2019)