From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Canham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. Cr.S. 08-363-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. Cr.S. 08-363-GEB

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM, Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Dennis S. Waks for MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL BRODERICK, Bar # 89424

Federal Defender

DENNIS S. WAKS, Bar #142581

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, MICHAEL M. BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM, that the current Status Conference date of January 20, 2012 be vacated and reset for March 2, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

Defense counsel needs additional time to prepare, to review the discovery, and to interview witnesses.

It is further stipulated and agreed to between the parties that the time from the date of the signing of this order to and including March 2, 2012 should be excluded within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

Dennis S. Waks

DENNIS S. WAKS

Supervising Assistant Federal

Defender

Attorney for Defendant

LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Dennis S. Waks for

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through March 2, 2012.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Canham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. Cr.S. 08-363-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Canham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

No. Cr.S. 08-363-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)