From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cancel

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 8, 2024
2:23-mj-01127-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-mj-01127-ADB

05-08-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IVETTE CANCEL


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

HONORABLE ANDREA D. BERGMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with (he operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds; [√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Cancel

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 8, 2024
2:23-mj-01127-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Cancel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IVETTE CANCEL

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

2:23-mj-01127-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)