From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Camarato

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 28, 2011
CR No. 04-3Q044-AA (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CR No. 04-3Q044-AA

08-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID JOHN CAMARATO,


OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, Judge:

Defendant, appearing pro se, requests that the court remove references to a firearms and related convictions contained in his Presentence Investigation Report, which resulted in a two-level enhancement of his sentencing offense level. Defendant's request is based on the apparent denial by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to award plaintiff good-time credit upon completion of the Residential Drug Abuse Program (RDAP).

However, the statute of limitations for bringing a § 2255 motion to correct or modify his sentence has long passed, and defendant's motion would be a successive motion which is prohibited absent approval from the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) ("A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section."); see also id. §§ 2244(b) (3) (A) .

Accordingly, defendant's petition for relief (doc. 39) is DENIED, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Camarato

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 28, 2011
CR No. 04-3Q044-AA (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Camarato

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID JOHN CAMARATO,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 28, 2011

Citations

CR No. 04-3Q044-AA (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2011)