From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Camacho

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 9, 2015
Cr. S 07-170 MCE, Cr. S 07-289 MCE, Cr. S 07-428 MCE (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, HANNAH R. LABAREE, Assistant Federal Defender Counsel Designated for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant JUAN CAMACHO.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         Defendant, JUAN CAMACHO, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On April 5, 2011, this Court sentenced Mr. Camacho to a total term of 171 months imprisonment on the above-captioned cases, comprised of 171 months on Count 1 in No. 2:07-cr-170 (for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1)), 171 months on Count 1 in No. 2:07-cr-428 (for violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1)), and 36 months on Count 1 in 2:07-cr-289 (for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4), to be served concurrently;

         3. As to the drug offense, the combined total offense level was 35, the criminal history category was I, and the resulting guideline range was 168 to 210 months;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Camacho was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973;

         5. Mr. Camacho's total offense level has been reduced from 35 to 33, and his amended guideline range is 135 to 168 months. A comparable point within the new range yields a new term of 138 months imprisonment;

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Camacho's term of imprisonment in Nos. 2:07-cr-170 and 2:07-cr-428 to a term of 138 months, to be served concurrently to each other and to the 36-month term of imprisonment in No. 2:07-cr-289. The parties agree this term is fair and reasonable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that in Nos. 2:07-cr-170 and 2:07-cr-428, Mr. Camacho is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total combined offense level from 35 to 33, resulting in an amended guideline range of 135 to 168 months. A comparable point within the new range yields a new term of 138 months imprisonment.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the total term of imprisonment imposed in April 2011 is reduced to 138 months, comprised of 138 months on Count 1 in No. 2:07-cr-170 and 138 months on Count 1 in No. 2:07-cr-428, to be served concurrently to each other and to the 36-month term of imprisonment in No. 2:07-cr-289. This sentence is fair and reasonable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Camacho shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Camacho

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 9, 2015
Cr. S 07-170 MCE, Cr. S 07-289 MCE, Cr. S 07-428 MCE (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CAMACHO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 9, 2015

Citations

Cr. S 07-170 MCE, Cr. S 07-289 MCE, Cr. S 07-428 MCE (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2015)