From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Camacho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
No. CR 11-00303 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 11-00303 PSG

11-30-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OSCAR CAMACHO, SR. Defendant.

VARELL L. FULLER Assistant Federal Public Defender EUMI CHOI Assistant United States Attorney


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

VARELL L. FULLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Defendant CAMACHO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

TO JANUARY 26, 2012, AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


STIPULATION

Defendant Oscar Camacho Sr., by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Varell L. Fuller, and the United States, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Eumi Choi, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the status hearing currently set for Thursday, December 1, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., shall be continued to Thursday, January 26, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

The reason for the requested continuance is, defense counsel's review of the additional discovery provided remains on-going, as well as defense counsel's investigation and legal research with respect to issues that are potentially relevant to Mr. Camacho's defense. Accordingly, the parties agree that the time between December 1, 2011, and January 26, 2012, may be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation by defense counsel.

VARELL L. FULLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

EUMI CHOI

Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing currently set for Thursday, December 1, 2011, shall be continued to Thursday, January 26, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

THE COURT FINDS that failing to exclude the time between December 1, 2011, and January 26, 2012, would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

THE COURT FINDS that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between December 1, 2011, and January 26, 2012, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between December 1, 2011, and January 26, 2012, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Camacho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2011
No. CR 11-00303 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OSCAR CAMACHO, SR. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

No. CR 11-00303 PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)