From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Caicedo-Rivas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 18, 2014
579 F. App'x 960 (11th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-10251

09-18-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARLOS ALBERTO CAICEDO-RIVAS, a.k.a. Carlos Ramirez, a.k.a. Carlos Eduardo Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00104-SDM-TBM-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before MARTIN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Torres, counsel for Carlos Alberto Caicedo-Rivas in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Caicedo-Rivas's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Caicedo-Rivas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 18, 2014
579 F. App'x 960 (11th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Caicedo-Rivas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARLOS ALBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 18, 2014

Citations

579 F. App'x 960 (11th Cir. 2014)