From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cady

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2022
2:21-mj-00439-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-mj-00439-EJY-1

04-06-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WADE FORREST CADY, Defendants

TODD M. LEVENTHAL Counsel for Defendant Darnele Nelson MINA CHANG Assistant United States Attorney


TODD M. LEVENTHAL Counsel for Defendant Darnele Nelson

MINA CHANG Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

(FOURTH REQUEST)

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Christopher Chiou, Acting United States Attorney, and Mina Chang, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Todd M. Leventhal, Esq., counsel for WADE FORREST CADY that the Status Conference set for April 13, 2022, be continued and set to a date and time convenient to this Court after May 10, 2022, in which date Defendant shall have completed all requirements. (Please note Mr. Leventhal will be out of jurisdiction 06-24-22 - 7/8/2022)

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The defendant is not in custody and does not object to the continuance.
2. The parties agree to the continuance.
3. The defendant has been attending his required classes (see exhibit 1). He will have completed all requirements by May 10, 2022. Defendant needs additional time in order to complete all requirements.
4. Additionally, denial of the continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

The additional time is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) based on the factors outlined in §3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the fourth stipulation to continue the Status Conference Hearing.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The defendant is not in custody and does not object to the continuance.
2. The parties agree to the continuance.
3. The defendant has been attending his required classes (see exhibit 1). He will have completed all requirements by May 10, 2022. Defendant needs additional time in order to complete all requirements.
4 Additionally, denial of the continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

The additional time is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) based on the factors outlined in §3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the fourth stipulation to continue the Status Conference Hearing.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial because the failure to grant it would likely result in a miscarriage of justice. This continuance is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) based on the factors outlined in §161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Status Conference currently scheduled for April 13, 2022 at the hour of 9:00 a.m., is vacated and continued to May 18, 2022 at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3D.


Summaries of

United States v. Cady

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2022
2:21-mj-00439-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Cady

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WADE FORREST CADY, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-mj-00439-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)