From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Criminal Action No. 3:05-CR-0139-L (01) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 3:05-CR-0139-L (01)

08-16-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD EUGENE CADE


ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on July 18, 2012, recommending that: (1) Defendant Edward Eugene Cade ("Defendant") should be granted a three-day extension of time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4) because he has shown excusable neglect for the delay in filing a notice of appeal; and (2) his motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied because his appeal presents no legal points of arguable merit. Defendant filed objections to the Report on August 2, 2012. Defendant objects only to the magistrate judge's conclusion that his motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, contending that his appeal is deserving of review for a number of reasons without the payment of fees.

Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, and overrules Defendant's objections. In determining whether Defendant should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal as requested, the magistrate judge properly considered whether the appeal is taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

The court grants Defendant a three-day extension of time to appeal under Fed. R. App. 4(b)(4), and his appeal filed on January 26, 2012, is deemed timely; the court denies Defendant's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 93). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), the court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. In support of the finding that the appeal is not taken in good faith, the court adopts and incorporates by reference its January 5, 2012 order, denying Defendant's Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the court has certified that the appeal is not taken in good faith, Defendant may challenge this finding by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, within 30 days of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

It is so ordered this 16th day of August, 2012.

_______________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Criminal Action No. 3:05-CR-0139-L (01) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cade

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD EUGENE CADE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

Criminal Action No. 3:05-CR-0139-L (01) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2012)