From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Caballero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-0 02 99-AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-0 02 99-AWI

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LEONEL MARTINEZ CABALLERO, VICENTA MUNOZ-PERALTA, aka "Norma," MARIANO VEGA HERNANDEZ, MARTIN MUNOZ PERALTA, ROMAN SANTANA, ANTONIO HERNANDEZ SANCHEZ, and EDGAR ALONSO BAUTISTA ARAZATE, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III Assistant U.S. Attorney CRISTOBAL PEREZ Attorney for Defendant LEONEL MARTINEZ CABALLERO SALVATORE SCIANDRA Attorney for Defendant VICENTA MUNOZ-PERALTA KATHERINE L. HART Attorney for Defendant MARIANO VEGA HERNANDEZ DAVID A. TORRES Attorney for Defendant MARTIN MUNOZ PERALTA RUBEN A. VILLALOBOS Attorney for Defendant ROMAN SANTANA CAROL ANN MOSES Attorney for Defendant ANTONIO HERNANDEZ SANCHEZ STEVEN L. CRAWFORD Attorney for Defendant EDGAR ALONSO BAUTISTA ARAZATE


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND DEFENDANTS

WHEREAS, the discovery in this case is voluminous and contains a large amount of personal and confidential information including but not limited to dates of birth, telephone numbers and residential addresses ("Protected Information"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid both the necessity of large scale redactions and the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of this information to anyone not a party to the court proceedings in this matter;

The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate.

THEREFORE, Defendants, by and through their counsel of record ("Defense Counsel"), and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Henry Z. Carbajal III, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This Court may enter a protective order pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

2. This Order pertains to all discovery provided to or made available to Defense Counsel as part of discovery in this case (hereafter, collectively known as "the discovery").

3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to share any documents that contain Protected Information with anyone other than Defense Counsel attorneys, designated defense investigators, and support staff. Defense Counsel may permit the Defendant to view unredacted documents in the presence of his attorney, defense investigators, and support staff. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not allow the Defendant to copy Protected Information contained in the discovery. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff may provide the Defendant with copies of documents from which Protected Information has been redacted.

4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose. The discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States of America ("Government"). Defense Counsel will return the discovery to the Government or certify that it has been shredded at the conclusion of the case.

5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising his Defendant, employees, and other members of the defense team, and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

7. In the event that Defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: CRISTOBAL PEREZ

Attorney for Defendant

LEONEL MARTINEZ CABALLERO

By: SALVATORE SCIANDRA

Attorney for Defendant

VICENTA MUNOZ-PERALTA

By: KATHERINE L. HART

Attorney for Defendant

MARIANO VEGA HERNANDEZ

By: DAVID A. TORRES

Attorney for Defendant

MARTIN MUNOZ PERALTA

By: RUBEN A. VILLALOBOS

Attorney for Defendant

ROMAN SANTANA

By: CAROL ANN MOSES

Attorney for Defendant

ANTONIO HERNANDEZ SANCHEZ

By: STEVEN L. CRAWFORD

Attorney for Defendant

EDGAR ALONSO BAUTISTA ARAZATE

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Caballero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-0 02 99-AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Caballero

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LEONEL MARTINEZ CABALLERO, VICENTA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-cr-0 02 99-AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)